The Kulik, Kulik, and Cohen article was fascinating to read. The authors seem so enthralled with the “new” meta-analysis. Even at this early date it seems clear that meta-analysis offered a more in depth picture of results than the previously used box scores. The authors still seem at times to be leery of this new way of doing things. It is great to not have articles older than 10 years be deemed as worthless.
Okay, back to the A&T stuff. I really thought this method more appealing than PSI. I think the appeal is clearest in the small assembly sessions. I think this is one thing we can all learn from our elementary school educators. When you watch an elementary teacher lead a small group in reading, math etc… they are doing small assembly session. The students gain a trust in that group and they share their ideas. I remember when I was in 4th grade and I was switched halfway thru the year from the bluebird group to the robin group. It took me a couple of weeks to accept that this new group would respect my opinion. Why we suddenly pull this scaffolding away in middle school has always baffled me. I think it comes down to economics in a way. It is more efficient to teach lecture halls of 100 than to teach a SAS of 6-8.
Should we use A&T? I think that unlike the PSI (and its modular mastery) the A&T offers a glimpse into something useful. I agree Kozma, Belle and Williams that “one really learns a subject when one prepares to teach it”. While this isn’t always possible or necessary, it can help solidify the important aspects of a subject.
I think that the A&T system is closer to what we see in online education today than PSI. The best online courses and traditional courses include elements of the A&T model. First you review the evidence (independent study). Then you get expert input (General Assembly Session). Finally, you break down into small groups and quiz and discuss (Small Assembly Session).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Rachel,
ReplyDeleteI also think that SAS is really important for teaching students to learn collaboratively as well as a good chance for younger kids to be a listener and tutor for other kids in their small group. You pointed out a truth that schools usually seek for "efficient" ways instead of the best ways to help learning. That's main reason why I left the private language academy that I'd worked for 5 years. In this kind of private institution, profit is the most important thing. Hopefully, I can find a school that can keep the balance between its profit and quality of instruction in the future.
Miya Kao
Hi Rachel,
ReplyDeleteI very well agree that the small group sessions are key activities which boost student's confidence level.In a small group more attention to each individual does the trick. Whereas in a large group, personal attention is not possible.
I remember while working as lecturer -lectures delivered in a large class versus labs for 2 or 3 students per group, show great difference. Students are more open during the lab time. Small groups plus hands on opportunities probably encourage them.
It is my personal experience that 'one really learns a subject when one prepares to teach it'.
You portrayed the similarity between AT and online education well. I admire the way Dr. Oliver posts the audio lectures in Moodle. I see it in a way it AT approach itself.
Just an idea... wouldn't it be fascinating if we educated people in small groups for their entire learning career? (At least their "official" learning career!) Something I thought of while I was reading your post! :)
ReplyDeleteFrom Jennifer Knott: Also... learning by listening (and reading, if provided) happens individually, and then it rolls around in the brain until the learner decides what they think about it. The SAS are very important, not only in confirming the learned materials are "correct", but in developing peer support for the individual. In effect, the learners become the teachers or leaders.
ReplyDeleteI, too, like the fact that the A-T approach emphasizes collaboration. However, I think that self-conscious students would find the SAS unpleasant if presentations were involved. For younger students, I think the SAS would need to be modified to make the experience more intimate and less formal.
ReplyDeleteRachel, I have also found that preparing to teach has helped me master material. I have not really seen a use of the A-T program as it was described in the article, but did find myself thinking that adopting such a format would enhance any student's learning. Using a format of ISS, SAS and GAS, should be beneficial regardless of the medium of materials used!
ReplyDelete